Bear With Me: Remembering the Lazarsfeld Stanton Program Analyzer

April 26, 2008

Sometime in the late 1950s, my elementary school class was loaded onto a bus for the 27 mile trip down the San Bernardino Freeway from Rowland Avenue Elementary School in West Covina, California to CBS Television City in Hollywood.

 

 

 

The media were already in my blood and I just may have been the most excited kid in the class. We were going to be in the audience of Art Linkletter’s House Party to watch several of my classmates appear on a legendary segment of the show  called “Kids Say the Darndest Things.”

 

 

To this day, it bothers me that I wasn’t chosen to be on the kids segment. I never learned why. I actually remember a counselor at UCLA’s psychological services center in 1969 looking at me like I was nuts when I described it as one of my “fundamental hurts.”

 

But the real shocker was when we pulled up in front of Television City and my entire class walked onto Linkletter’s soundstage, with the exception of Rachel, Barbara, and me.  A nice man in a bow tie who looked vaguely like Wally Cox diverted us into a small screening room  studio with wires everywhere and asked us to remain seated and quiet.

 

I was devastated. No Art Linkletter. No “Kids Say the Darndest Things.” No soundstage.

 

Then Wally returned and told us that we were going to be part of an important experiment. They wanted to see how a machine that had already been around for a while, a machine that tested whether people did or did not like television shows, would work with kids. And so they gave us each two small devices, one of which we were to hold in each hand.

 

“Press one button when you like the show, Wally told us, and press the other when you don’t.”  Then the lights dimmed and an episode of the not yet broadcast sit-com “Dennis the Menace” came on the screen. For 25 minutes, I watched this ridiculous show and never lifted my finger from the “don’t like” button.

 

 

I really thought it was dumb. I was mad at missing all the fun. Story over.

 

Well, not quite.

 

Almost exactly twenty years later I was sitting in a graduate seminar on methods of media research at Columbia with a brilliant young professor, Dr. Josephine Holz. And that was the day that I learned that the machine had not been just any contraption, but something called the Lazarsfeld-Stanton Program Analyzer, a pioneering device designed by two towering figures in the history of broadcasting, Drs. Frank Stanton and Paul Lazarsfeld.  It may have taken 20 years, but finally it was the other kids who had been the losers and it was me who had been actually hooked up to the machine.

 

Oh, and I still think Dennis the Menace was a dumb show.

  

Now if you want to talk about The Jetsons, that was a work of genius.

 

 

 


Don’t Blame Katie, Blame a Tidal Wave of Social and Technological Change

April 22, 2008

It’s a habit I have.

Whenever the media pile on an individual, I never assume that the target is taking the heat for the publicized reason. More often, some deeper collective anxiety is lying there right below the surface, festering because we find it easier to blame an individual than to face a more fundamental truth. Celebrities and personalities are convenient targets and riveting news hooks, but they are rarely the whole story.

Last week Katie Couric and the CBS Evening News had their lowest ratings since she joined the broadcast. Now we’ll hear the inevitable agonizing about why the ratings were low and why she failed to attract a younger audience.

So here’s my 2 cents.

I think it is flat out crazy to blame Katie Couric for failing to accomplish something that was pretty ridiculous in the first place. CBS, like each of the other major networks, have long agonized about why their signature evening newscasts have attracted such aging audiences. Who wouldn’t get tired of selling ads for laxatives and the purple pill, whatever that is? And occasionally each of the networks have managed to lower the average age of their audience by a year or two. But this was never enough for those newscasts to become significant profit centers.

And then CBS news decided that Katie Couric could revive and rejuvenate their broadcast. When neither the audience nor the youth showed up, the piling on began.

I simply want to suggest something that others like Jeff Jarvis of BuzzMachine have been saying for a long time: This is no longer about youth or demographics or audience size of the evening news. Incremental changes in the size and age of the evening news audience will not render the evening newscasts either profitable or relevant.

People are finding their news in different places and new technologies are evolving at breakneck speed. But most importantly, the old model that focused the entire news gathering process on a daily prestige broadcast no longer makes any sense. As one of “Cronkite’s Kids” I share some of the nostalgia for this daily national gathering, but nostalgia will simply not render it relevant.

Young people are consuming news, and they have not completely abandoned traditional sources, but they are now also finding it in blogs, streaming video and audio, television network websites, cell phones, and social networking sites. In the last few days, MSNBC signed a deal in which they will provide news content to – are you ready? – MySpace.

News is alive and well. There simply are too many thriving and competing producers of news content to keep the old nightly news franchise afloat. One talented journalist will never reverse a tidal wave of social and technological change.

Katie Couric didn’t fail. The suits did.