Dead Famous Person (D.F.P.) and Journalist

 

This happened about six months ago. I have tried to forget it. So much for forgetting.

 

A famous person was killed.  Within the hour, people who knew dead famous person (D.F.P.) began circulating the news and posting emotional reactions on the Internet.

 

One of those posts was by a less famous, high profile journalist who almost immediately published an astoundingly scathing portrait of D.F.P.

 

D.F.P.,  he argued, was – in his relationships with other still-alive famous persons — mean-spirited, arrogant, dishonest, and even cruel.  Those who only knew of D.F.P.’s public contributions and admirable body of work (like me) were stunned.  This wasn’t Pol Pot, but was someone who very well might have been a jerk.

 

The story would have ended there, were it not for the anger I began to feel for the speed with which the critical piece appeared. D.F.P.’s  funeral had not yet taken place, and many friends and admirers were still coming to terms with a tragic death.

 

So I called journalist, and asked:

 

“Is there any case to be made for a “grace period,” however short, between a death and the publication of a scathing personal portrait, particularly when the scathing stuff is primarily inside information?”

 

“Might D.F.P.’s family and friends deserve even a day or two before nuanced and critical portraits became absolutely acceptable?”

 

“Or has the era of blunt and instant information made it old-fashioned or impractical to temporarily hold fire out of respect for a family’s feelings?”

 

Journalist’s answer still chills me.

 

“Sorry, but I don’t buy into false sentimentalism.  I wrote the truth.  Period.”

 

I really couldn’t respond.  I still can’t.

 

What can you say to someone who sees even temporary consideration of a family’s feelings to be nothing more than “false sentimentalism?”

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Dead Famous Person (D.F.P.) and Journalist

  1. We lost two fine journalists last year: Molly Ivins and David Halberstam. The former died of breast cancer, the latter was killed in an auto accident.

    Considering the enemies that they both had made in government, and its MSM lackeys, either one could have had scathing obituaries written about them. I’m going to guess because of your verb choice – was killed – that you’re likely writing about Halberstam.

    How does one respond to a comment like “Sorry, but I don’t buy into false sentimentalism. I wrote the truth. Period.”

    I would have said, “You don’t have to buy into real sentimentalism neither, because there will be none in your obit.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s